The problem I've found with keeping things as "unread" to "give my full attention to later" is that every now and then I accidentally hit the "mark all as read" button instead of the "refresh" button. So these days I star them instead.
Lifehacker and the other Gawker are pretty much all the same if you have read them for more than a week. Lifehacker seems to devote more and more time to "What not to eat" type posts and the other Gawker feeds seem to follow one standard script: Sensational title followed by story lacking most of the facts followed by 100 snarky holier-than-though know-nothings arguing about it. About 80% of the way down someone will introduce key facts that invalidate the original story but by then the mob has moved onto the next post.
2 comments:
The problem I've found with keeping things as "unread" to "give my full attention to later" is that every now and then I accidentally hit the "mark all as read" button instead of the "refresh" button. So these days I star them instead.
Lifehacker and the other Gawker are pretty much all the same if you have read them for more than a week. Lifehacker seems to devote more and more time to "What not to eat" type posts and the other Gawker feeds seem to follow one standard script: Sensational title followed by story lacking most of the facts followed by 100 snarky holier-than-though know-nothings arguing about it. About 80% of the way down someone will introduce key facts that invalidate the original story but by then the mob has moved onto the next post.
You won't miss anything by unsubbing.
Post a Comment